Wednesday 29 October 2014

Iron Man 2 (2010)



Iron Man 2 (2010)


Release Date: May 7, 2010

After Marvel came out of nowhere with the success of Iron Man, and started building up to a shared universe with Nick Fury’s cameo at the end of Iron Man and Tony Stark’s cameo at the end of The Incredible Hulk, people were starting to take notice. As such, expectations were raised for the studio’s first sequel. Could Iron Man 2 live up to the original, or would Marvel stumble?

After coming out as Iron Man at the end of the previous film, Tony Stark has become even more of a media darling than he used to be, if such a thing is possible for a person who was already egotistical and narcissistic. Tony is now performing as Iron Man at the Stark Expo, a scientific event dedicated to Tony Stark and how he is awesome and kewl. However, this display is a front, as Tony isn’t nearly as happy out of the public eye. The US military is putting pressure on Tony to hand the Iron Man armour over to them, and he is slowly being poisoned to death by the palladium used to power the suit, which is making black marks on his body as if he were a L’Cie, which he isn’t because the Marvel Cinematic Universe hasn’t introduced magic yet, and why would it cross over with Final Fantasy anyway? These pressures are making Tony act in an increasingly self-destructive manner, culminating in him resigning as CEO of Stark Enterprises and appointing Pepper Potts as his successor, while he goes off to drive cars.

Tony’s car driving career comes to an end after the first race when he is attacked by Ivan Vanko, AKA the supervillain Whiplash. Vanko has a grudge against Tony because he thinks that his father’s research was plagiarized by Tony’s father, who got Vanko’s father deported. Vanko used Stark Industries blueprints stolen by rival company head Justin Hammer to fashion his own suit of armour, before realising Ivan Man was a stupid name, and making electrified plasma whips instead. Vanko is defeated by Tony’s bodyguard Happy Hogan, who drives his car onto the track and runs over Vanko repeatedly so that Tony can put the Iron Man armour on and beat Vanko properly. Vanko is imprisoned, but the now disgraced Hammer breaks him out of prison and assigns him to work on suits for Hammer.

Vanko’s assassination attempt causes Tony to sink further into depression and alcoholism, which causes his friend Rhodey to say enough is enough and take a suit of War Machine armour to hand over to the military because he feels Tony is irresponsible. At this point, Tony is visited by Nick Fury, head of SHIELD, who had placed his subordinate Black Widow as an undercover spy at Stark Industries. Fury reveals that Tony’s father had discovered a new element, but that the technology wasn’t in place at the time to create it, which is presumably why he lost out to Andrew Ryan and his proposal for a city under the sea at the World’s Fair. Anyway, Tony’s technology is now advanced enough that he is able to finish his father’s work, and the resulting element is the perfect replacement for Palladium, conveniently enough. Not even a threatening phone call from Ivan Vanko can ruin Tony’s good mood, though he does head to the Stark Expo, having traced the call as coming from Justin Hammer’s laboratory, with Hammer due to make a presentation at the Stark Expo.

Hammer makes his presentation, and shows off an army of military drones, with War Machine as the piece de resistance. (Vanko had changed his mind about making suits of armour, insisting that “Drones better.”) When Iron Man crashes the party, Vanko hacks the drones and War Machine, and sics them on Iron Man, who is able to trick the drones into destroying each other. After discovering Hammer’s involvement in the incident, Pepper Potts gets him arrested, while Black Widow hacks into War Machine and releases the suit from Vanko’s programming, allowing Rhodey to control it again. Iron Man and War Machine team up and rather easily defeat Vanko, now piloting his own Ivan Man suit with electrified plasma whips.

A positive aspect of the film is that the returning characters from the first film are handled well. Tony Stark is as entertaining as he was first time round, yet this film also finds the time to explore his personal issues. The suggestion that he isn’t happy and is putting on a show while living as recklessly as possible with the time he has left makes the character more interesting and brings a degree of emotional depth that was absent last time, since he got over being captured by terrorists fairly quickly following his escape. The only thing here that doesn’t quite sit right is a drunk Tony being played for laughs, given how his other issues are portrayed and the famous Demon in a Bottle comic arc, in which Tony battled alcoholism. Supporting characters from the first film are given more to do this time, with the most prominent examples being Pepper Potts and Rhodey, who is established as being a friend of Tony’s, but one who isn’t afraid to call him out or give him a kick up the ass when he needs it. In this film, Rhodey is recast with Don Cheadle (Terence Howard played him in the first film.) It wouldn’t really be fair to say that Cheadle is better than Howard, since the latter didn’t have a lot of screen time to establish the character, but he seems to be more into the role, and has become the actor more associated with the role. It’s funny how that works out with the Marvel Cinematic Universe. In both cases of a character being recast, the second actor is the one who is more closely associated with the role.

Not pictured: an email from Mark Ruffalo saying “U mad bro?”

To be honest, Vanko isn’t all that interesting as a villain. He doesn’t have much of a personality, and his beef with the Stark name is both one-sided and aimed more at Tony’s father, rather than anything Tony himself has done. Perhaps it would have carried more weight if Tony had acknowledged the animosity a little bit, as it might have helped elevate Vanko as a bit more of a threat. Vanko is in the odd position of being a personal villain who isn’t seen by his opponent as being personal. His weak showing at the climax also reflects poorly on him in this respect. This could possibly be due to scenes showing Vanko in a sympathetic light being deleted, according to Mickey Rourke. On the other hand, Justin Hammer is great as a love-to-hate smug prick who cannot go five minutes without being passive-aggressive. He’s among the least powerful villains in these films, yet he’s easily among the most punchable, but in the best possible way.

The set-piece scene where Vanko attacks Tony on the race track is the film’s highlight, giving Vanko a great entrance, and making for an exciting and creative fight sequence, as well as that transforming suitcase. However, it does pose a problem in that this scene comes in at the 30 minute mark, and the rest of the film’s action sequences fail to top it. This great entrance could also contribute towards Vanko’s disappointment, as he cannot live up that first impression. The final battle is a big anti-climax in this regard, as he tosses Iron Man and War Machine around for a minute or so, then they take him down with one attack. It doesn’t compare with the Iron Monger battle from the first film, and a small battalion of drones being reduced to scrap metal isn’t enough to make up for the anti-climax.

In reference to the question posed at the start, I would argue Iron Man 2 stumbles. It’s certainly the weakest entry in the Marvel Cinematic Universe reviewed thus far, but it’s still decently watchable. Iron Man 2 falls victim to the unspoken rule that the second film of a superhero series is the best (for evidence, see Superman II, Spider-Man 2, X-Men 2, The Dark Knight etc), and is unable to live up to the expectations this trend imposes.

Stan Lee Spotter: Stan Lee appears as US talk show host Larry King, attending the Stark Expo’s opening as a guest.

Next Time: Stop, Hammer Time!

Bonus: At the end of the film, Ivan Vanko kills himself by activating the self-destruct mechanism in his Ivan Man suit and the drones. Originally, he was going to survive this scene and return later to attack Tony and Pepper, but Rhodey would finish him off. This was cut and his death was not shown on screen, just in case Marvel wanted to say he survived and bring him back later. I don’t think that’s happening though, since Mickey Rourke didn’t enjoy working on the film. Maybe Thanos can get Vanko’s burd in Avengers 3?

Friday 24 October 2014

In Which Topical Humour Bites Me in the Ass

In Which Topical Humour Bites Me in the Ass

I was slightly annoyed to discover that, as of yesterday, a topical joke in one of my reviews is now out of date. It was a line in the Digimon review, specifically this one.
"Unfortunately, by the time they get there, Keromon has filled up on cat pictures, porn and people complaining that Ridley and Mewtwo aren’t in Smash Bros 4, enabling it to evolve into its ultimate form, Infermon (a cross between a spider, a peanut and a tank.)"
At the time I wrote the Digimon review, this was pretty funny, or at least I hope so anyway. Yesterday however, this happened.


Mewtwo was announced as the first DLC character for Super Smash Bros 4, to be released next year. It's good to see him back, having missed out on Brawl, but I am a little sad that my joke died for Mewtwo, though it is ironic that it was the Digimon review that Mewtwo gave the finger to. The Pokemon Vs Digimon rivalry lives on! At least Ridley remains unplayable, so the joke still kinda works...

Tuesday 14 October 2014

Film Rankings: 20-1




Film Rankings: 20-1

With twenty films now reviewed, the time has come for another ranking session. Many of the new entries are at the lower end of the scale, with only three managing to make the top 10. Which were they? Read on to find out.

20. Elektra
“Elektra is to blame for the existence of social justice warriors on Tumblr. Thanks a lot, Elektra.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

19. Blade Trinity
“Blade Trinity is a metaphorical wooden stake through the heart of what used to be an entertaining little series.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

18. X-Men Origins Wolverine
“It’s so bad that erasing it from existence was too much acknowledgement that it ever existed in the first place.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

17. Punisher: War Zone
“Punisher: War Zone’s grit and darkness is its undoing.”
Yay or Nay? Nay, unless you’re Patton Oswalt, in which case Yay!

16. Hulk
“At times, it almost feels like Hulk is ashamed to be based on a comic about a big green rage monster.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

15. Fantastic Four
“The title is only half accurate. Unfortunately, the second half of the title is the accurate one.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

14. Ghost Rider
“The cool concept just isn’t enough to make up for the film’s flaws.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

13. Spider-Man 3
“It’s a real shame that this continuity couldn’t have gone out on a higher note.”
Yay or Nay? Nay!

12. Daredevil
“Ultimately, Daredevil is a disappointing film that is made more watchable whenever the focus of a particular scene is Kingpin or Bullseye.”
Yay or Nay? Nay, unless you can get hold of the Director’s Cut. In that case, Yay!

11. Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer
“Fantastic Four: Rise of the Silver Surfer proved to be a pleasant surprise.”
Yay or Nay? Maybe?

10. X-Men: The Last Stand
“While I do agree that it isn’t as good as the first two, I suspect that I liked X-Men: The Last Stand more than most.”
Yay or Nay? Maybe?

9. The Punisher
“This film does a better job of sticking to the darker tone than Daredevil did, due to the toning down of the sillier elements, and reining in suspension of disbelief.”
Yay or Nay? Maybe?

8. Spider-Man
“The film doesn’t hold up quite as well as it used to, because the story beats have become so familiar from so many other films taking notes.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

7. Blade
“Blade is a highly stylish, though occasionally dated, action film that doesn’t let a lack of substance get in the way of being a fun time to watch.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

6. The Incredible Hulk
“Fortunately, The Incredible Hulk has learned from its predecessor’s mistakes.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

5. X-Men
“While there are no shortage of cool effects and fight scenes, the secret to X Men’s success is the cast of characters. They’re easy to like, even the villains, and they show us that there is more to them than just their powers.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

4. Blade II
“Blade II is better than the original. It’s faster paced in both action and storyline, the fight scenes are more exciting to watch and the villains pose more of a threat. This one is recommended for those with a strong stomach.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

3. Iron Man
“Marvel threw down the gauntlet and proved that they could play with the others.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

2. X-Men 2
“X-Men 2 manages to improve on the first film by exploring issues of tolerance and peace in greater depth, as well as improving on the already good action scenes from the first film.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!

Number 1. Spider-Man 2
“Spider-Man 2 is like Spider-Man 1, but bigger and better. The stakes are higher, the conflict is more personal for both Peter Parker and Spider-Man, and the villain is stronger. This improves on the original in every way.”
Yay or Nay? Yay!


So, Spider-Man 2 remains at number 1. There will be one more ranking list after this one. The final list will come at the end of the series, after I have watched and reviewed all of the films I plan on covering. Will Spider-Man 2 still be at number 1? How will the final batch of films compare to these ones? Stay tuned to find out.